Does the low number of US UNESCO Cultural Heritage Sites embarrass you? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:55:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Does the low number of US UNESCO Cultural Heritage Sites embarrass you? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does the low number of US UNESCO Cultural Heritage Sites embarrass you?  (Read 718 times)
KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸
KoopaDaQuick
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,305
Anguilla


Political Matrix
E: -8.50, S: -5.74


WWW
« on: August 30, 2020, 03:11:36 PM »

who care

A place being a UNESCO heritage site is nothing more than a rubber stamp in the grand scheme of things. Just because UNESCO thinks a place is "culturally, historically, or scientifically significant" doesn't make it any less arbitrary than any other jackass' opinion. Sure, I can see how such a project can be beneficial in creating world peace and preserving cultural integrity and yadda yadda yadda, but at the end of the day, it doesn't matter if the United States has 4, 24, or 204. Don't let international bureaucracy tell you what world landmarks should and shouldn't be appreciated.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.