Current Tradesports numbers (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 06:30:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Current Tradesports numbers (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Current Tradesports numbers  (Read 6778 times)
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW
« on: May 28, 2006, 04:17:43 PM »

It's hard to formulate odds when no one of significance has really thrown their hat into the ring. Until most people who were going to have joined the race; I pay little attention to the odds.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2006, 08:00:50 PM »

I think he's the only candidate who can beat Clinton.

I'd have to disagree. I would say that just about anyone sane could beat Hillary in the upcoming Democratic primary. She has what I like to call "Howard Dean" syndrom. Yes she is polling high because she is the only candidate that Democrats believe they have at the moment. The second someone else enters the race (by someone, I mean someone serious, not Mike Gravel) she'll fall off the map and finish third in the primaries.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2006, 10:57:58 PM »

I think he's the only candidate who can beat Clinton.

I'd have to disagree. I would say that just about anyone sane could beat Hillary in the upcoming Democratic primary. She has what I like to call "Howard Dean" syndrom. Yes she is polling high because she is the only candidate that Democrats believe they have at the moment. The second someone else enters the race (by someone, I mean someone serious, not Mike Gravel) she'll fall off the map and finish third in the primaries.
No, not quite.

Hillary has more name recognition than Dean did (I'm talking about your average voter, not a few beltway activists) more money than Dean, and the best political machine (and genius, in the person of Bill Clinton) that can be found.

She could be defeated by a united effort by party moderates to unite around one candidate during the early primaries (Warner, Bayh, Richardson..whoever) but she isn't going to simply die away, that's assured.

Most of what you say is true, but you are not taking into account that people don't like Hillary half as much as they liked Dean. At the time "Crazy Howard" was a very popular figure within the leftist realm of the party. Not one wing of the Democratic party is really enthusiastic about her where as at least Dean had the left.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.