In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 08:27:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016?  (Read 12594 times)
CookieDamage
cookiedamage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,147


« on: February 06, 2018, 09:58:33 PM »

Does no-one remember how Hillary Clinton was the popular former Secretary of State with 60%+ approval, while Trump was the race-baiting laughingstock who would lose in a massive landslide if he were somehow nominated?

In another timeline, it may have been Sanders losing to Rubio after being successfully painted as a left-wing extremist, with the consensus being that the "Tea Party of the left" had cost the Democrats a probable win by rejecting the qualified establishment moderate in Hillary Clinton for "McGovern 2.0".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.