MI: Public Policy Polling: Hoekstra going down in flames (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 12:02:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  MI: Public Policy Polling: Hoekstra going down in flames (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI: Public Policy Polling: Hoekstra going down in flames  (Read 1785 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« on: February 14, 2012, 03:25:26 PM »

I knew it'd be bad.  I'm part of that 45% who are less likely to support him (I won't vote for him).  It's REALLY hard to win an election with a net negative favorability rating.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2012, 05:27:42 PM »

Time for a new candidate. When is the filing deadline?


Please don't let this be the Katherine Harris of 2006, where everybody refuses to challenge the dud. They challenged him for Governor, and he lost. Someone please run! Bouchard, Land, Cox, anyone!

Ah Insky, you wouldn't happen to be anywhere close to age of 30 would you? Grin

Sadly, I have a few more years to go. Wink
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2012, 07:43:46 AM »

Terri Lynn Land would be a much better candidate, although I don't think she would get over 45%. Mike Cox would be the next best(but not that good of a candidate). Both have been elected statewide twice. Amash would have to give up his congressional seat for a longshot chance at a senate seat. He would be foolish to give up a safe house seat.

I didn't think Hoekstra had a chance before this ad ran. Too conservative. I think Stabenow is underestimated. She is not going to lose to anything other than a first rate candidate, even then it would be close barring a another recession, and the republicans don't have a first rate candidate. She is a good fit for Michigan. I think she would have won vs Land in 2010 too. Michigan doesn't send republicans to the senate. I could see Stabenow as senator for Michigan for a long time.


Spencer Abraham?   

The problem with MI has been timing. Levin is too popular to take out in any year. 2000, the state was won by Gore and in 2006, it was a bad GOP year.

Abraham lost to Stabenow 12 years ago.  And hardly anybody remembers who he is.

We don't have a good candidate.  Terri Lynn Land is probably the best one, and she didn't run.  Ultimately, this was a lost seat no matter who we ran.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2012, 12:54:06 PM »


His campaign was always weak. It'll be fun to watch the Yobs lose hard on this one.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.