MA: Mideast Labor Code Statute Revision (Statute) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 02:36:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: Mideast Labor Code Statute Revision (Statute) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: Mideast Labor Code Statute Revision (Statute)  (Read 9027 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« on: November 28, 2010, 04:42:45 PM »
I don't see the need for 2B; however, if it is kept, it should read "is exempted from part A", since A and B were consolidated.

For Section 3... what's the point of defining any of that if they're not obligated to receive that much?

Section 5, shouldn't we include "related" or some similar word after "any"... otherwise the employer is required to pay for all medical expenses of the employee (arguably indefinitely).

Also, what  were the changes made to the original statute, other than in Section 2?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2010, 10:10:51 PM »
We at least need to fix Section 5... that was a serious oversight when this was first passed.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2010, 10:32:52 PM »
Section 5 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2010, 12:17:28 AM »
AYE
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2010, 07:45:31 PM »
Well, the law wouldn't be struck down.  It would just be mainly pointless, unless the Federal law were ever repealed.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2010, 09:56:14 PM »
Sorry... but shouldn't we have something in case the federal government gets rid of minimum wage requirements?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2010, 12:34:46 AM »
In that case...

AYE
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2010, 02:36:57 AM »
What value would we like?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2010, 04:31:55 PM »
So, the consensus is $6.25 adjusted to inflation?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2010, 11:29:40 PM »
The following is hereby added to Section 2:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2010, 11:53:38 PM »
AYE
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2010, 11:12:01 PM »
AYE
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.