US Births 2007 - An Analysis by State and Race (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 12:59:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US Births 2007 - An Analysis by State and Race (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US Births 2007 - An Analysis by State and Race  (Read 6102 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« on: March 21, 2009, 05:34:10 AM »
« edited: March 21, 2009, 01:43:31 PM by Tender Branson »

I created this Excel sheet to show how births in the US broke down by state and race:



Release:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_12.pdf
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2009, 01:30:46 PM »

I just realized that I used Mid-2008 population numbers for 2007 Births ... Tongue

I'll correct it and post the new table soon Smiley
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2009, 01:43:48 PM »

I just realized that I used Mid-2008 population numbers for 2007 Births ... Tongue

I'll correct it and post the new table soon Smiley

Updated !
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2009, 01:45:13 PM »

Ohio seems to be the only bigger state with relatively few Hispanic children (4%).

Why is Ohio so anti-Hispanic ? Wink
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2009, 04:55:17 AM »

To continue my US Birth Analysis, here's how things changed over the past 10 years:



Notice for example how Idaho's population increased by "only" 24%, but its births rose by 35%.

And Michigan: The state's population grew by 3%, but births are down by 6%.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,201
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2009, 12:35:27 AM »

Births are due to increase in the U.S. thanks to the general demographics.  The baby boomers had children from the late '70s to the early '90s and now the "echo boomers" (our generation) are beginning to have kids, so the number of child bearing young women is on the rise.

In my area, people tend to have kids about a year or two younger than in the rest of the state, so we see these trends earlier.  The number of births peaked and plateaued from the baby boom from 1951-1962 or so before falling rapidly (by about 40%) by 1967 before slowly rising throughout the '70s and then rising rapidly in the late '70s, and plateauing again all through the '80s before falling rapidly in the early '90s... and the process started over... births slowly rose from 1995-2000 but have really begun to boom since about 2004.

Births will continue to rise and stay high here for another 10 years or so before falling again.

From 2000 to 2007 our county grew just under 10%, but the number of births jumped 22%.  During the '90s, population grew 16% but births fell about 10%.


Indeed, remember that the mean age at first time birth is 25 years, therefore I´m awaiting another US baby-boom by 2020, when the women born around 1990-1995 will get their kids. That's because the absolute number of births in 1990-1995 was considerably higher than from 1975-80 (the women who are now getting their children).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.