Opinion of Wikipedia’s deadname policy? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 03:10:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Wikipedia’s deadname policy? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Freedom Policy
 
#2
Horrible Policy
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Opinion of Wikipedia’s deadname policy?  (Read 720 times)
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

« on: June 18, 2023, 01:51:28 PM »

I believe this policy is probably related to another policy called “Biographies of Living Persons” - where material about living people (especially if said material is negative about the subject) must be reliably sourced in order to be included in articles. As its founder once said,

Quote
Real people are involved, and they can be hurt by your words. We are not tabloid journalism, we are an encyclopedia.

I’m not sure that analogy works here since tabloid journalism is heavily influenced by its subjects (and their publicists) whereas an encyclopedia is supposed to exclude their biased perspective.

The policy of reporting a birth name, only using that name if the subject was widely known under it (and then, only as little as possible consistent with the style guide, e.g., not overusing an old first name), and relaying the circumstances of a name change is fine.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 15 queries.