Amendment for Foreign Policy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 05:21:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Amendment for Foreign Policy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you agree with this amendment ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Maybe
 
#4
Don't know
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Amendment for Foreign Policy  (Read 1050 times)
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,532
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

« on: May 04, 2019, 07:32:51 PM »

Technically the Constitution prohibits military appropriations exceeding 2 years on the grounds that our military should never be "permanent". In practice they've never really been defunded but that is an option.

The limit is on army appropriations; navy appropriations can be for as long as Congress is willing. The reasoning is that a navy can't be used internally. Similar reasoning is part of why the UK has a Royal Navy and a Royal Air Force but not a Royal Army.

This assumption will look foolish when the Emperor begins shelling Chicago.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 15 queries.