No, but the system should be fairer. All primaries should occur on the same day.
I still say that this method would be awful; no candidate would gain a majority of delegates and the nominee would be decided at the convention. So instead of using the convention time to showcase a candidate, the party to go from ballot to ballot until the last man remains standing. When this happens, things can get ugly (1968).
Admittedly, I'm not a fan of New Hampshire, Iowa, and South Carolina deciding who the next President should be, but from a political perspective, it's preferable that way.
I disagree. An interesting convention would be much better. There should be a long hard debate at the convention where the party can really decide who would be the best. Party unity isn't necessary until after a candidate is nominated.
Poll
