...and we were worried about human rights abuses in Iraq.
There were, relatively speaking
virtually no human rights abuses in Iraq compared to those implemented daily in American allies in the region. Saddam Hussein was clearly a force for improvement in the middle eastern context.. again, it is all relative. The Baath movement was one of the better influences in the region, but of course it had to be crushed for not cowtowing to the empire. American involvement has always been to support these right-wing/'religious' extremists, who of course abuse women, minorities, poors, etc., just like their counterparts who rule the US.
I find it particularly amusing that jmfcst criticises theocrats in proxy states while he supports the same sort of rule in the imperial center.