Worst extremist views? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 02:32:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Worst extremist views? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Worst extremist views?  (Read 5660 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« on: July 10, 2004, 03:17:42 PM »

Even though I consider laissez faire economics the best extreme, I voted for social conservatism as the worst.  Economic leftists are pretty bad, but at least they think they're preventing misery.  Social leftists (in my view meddling  social 'conservatives' are on the anti-freedom left) are much worse, as they're just plain nosy and oppressive for no reason whatsoever.  Just busy bodies.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2004, 05:20:02 PM »

Social conservatives, they are holding us back.  


From what?

Having sex with minors?
Taking "Under God" out of the pledge?
From making America into New Amsterdam?
Being able to kill the useless aged and unborn?
Unregulated prostitution?
The destruction of the nuclear family?


Yes.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2004, 05:43:08 PM »


Consider the following Opebo:

Broken families produce out of proportionate amounts of broken children who committ out of proportionate amounts of crime and consume out or proportionate government services.

It is in your best interests, as a wealthy taxpayer, to live in an America with strong families.

I don't make enough money for it to have much effect on me.  It's not a conservative or liberal issue for me.  I hate to see people suffer.

People suffer when:

-families break up.
-children are molested.
-fathers blow the rent check on gambling.
-they become addicted to drugs.



Actually I'm all for stable families, but I fail to see what government regulation or religion/social conservatism has to do with it.  Forming and maintaining a family is a personal choice.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2004, 06:21:59 PM »

I must say, bejkuy, that the nuclear family has been intensely problematic. It has been a huge factor in the reinforcement of capitalism, patriarchy, and heterosexual dominance. It has historically caused a gyno-thanatic power structure, and to this day places no value on the ideas and hopes of children.

I rue for the fact that wives still feel obligated to have sex with their husbands. I mourn the emphasis on monogamy which often stifles pleasurable sex. I am saddened by how the views and concerns of children are often silenced by parents who believe in forcing them into acquiescence in the names of "discipline" and "respect". I am pained by how children cannot express themselves sexually, with privacy and autonomy, because I knew how difficult my life might have been if I hadn't decided to face my sexuality at a young age and start living. I cannot abide by how materialism, and not pure love, is how a family believes it can express its affection. For those reasons, and for all the suffering they have and will continue to cause, the changes our society must make are not just legal, but also educational, religious, and familial.

Alas, in a world of scarcity - which the working class faces every day - the family is almost entirely materialistic.  It has to be, for obvious practical reasons.  

Also, sex within marriage does have a rather hypocritical air of prostitution in denial.  Definitely not for everyone.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.