I'm not concerned about the very poor, and neither are most Americans. They give money to charities, in the hope that it helps the few who have encountered tragedy in their lives. The rest? Largely responsible for their own situation.
Americans are for lifting up the deserving and helping those who face difficulties. People who suck at life? They can drown.
There's a word for people like you. First syllable of 'country', in case you'd not guessed. I think in your case we can extend it somewhat; perhaps by adding 'obnoxious' in front of it. Perhaps things could be done with words like 'scum' and 'reprobate', and I suppose a case exists for the use of 'depraved'.
I'd use a word like "sociopath" as well.
Al, Lief, you are giving a bad name to we scum, sociopaths, and depraved reprobates. What makes people like Globalizer so pitiable is he
believes an absurd construct about 'how society works'. He believes that one can be 'good' or 'bad' at life, that one's individual efforts and 'hardness' of work matter. In other words he is a dupe of larger forces, and obnoxiously proud of it as well, due to classic group-mentality - 'there are more of us/my side is winning, so f-you'.
We amorals don't actually
care about the poor, or sympathize much (though we are very capable of fearing that we will be poor), but we are quite capable of recognizing the reality of capitalist exploitation and the rational that exists or the vast majority to guillotine the rich.
