How would you adjust these bracket-schedules? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 08:09:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  How would you adjust these bracket-schedules? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would you adjust these bracket-schedules?  (Read 2912 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« on: October 08, 2011, 12:17:54 PM »

Same brackets,

0%
7,550-36,550  - 5%
36,550-74,200 - 20%
74,200 - 154,800 - 40%
154,800 - 336,550 - 50%

New Brackets -

336,550-1,000,000 - 70%
1,000,000-5,000,000 - 80%
5,000,000-20,000,000 - 90%
20,000,000+                   99%

Obviously I only used the 'filing singly' graph, as I would do away with differential treatment for marrieds.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2011, 12:30:45 PM »

Yes, it depends on the deductions issue, and the quantity of same.

Under Opebo's little schedule, some country could get really rich by inviting those whose income opebo wants to take away, to come on down, and become citizens of their fair land, and renounce their US citizenship. John Templeton by the way lives in the Bahamas - as a citizen. He founded a mutual fund family, which bears his name.

But we would simply confiscate all their assets and blow up the Bahamas, Torie.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2011, 02:59:54 PM »

Well then China. The Chinese are very practical folks opebo - unlike - to pick a name at random - you!  Tongue

So just have the offender killed by a spy - the Russians used to do this all the time.  Stick him with a poison-tipped umbrella or put radioactive waste in his Cheerios.

But seriously, of course there is no chance of any policy being implemented which will diminish privilege.  Heck if anyone serious tried to do so there'd be poison in his Cheerios.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2011, 12:21:47 PM »

No, jmfcst, the problem is the rich. 
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2011, 03:18:14 PM »

And I could even scrap the minimum wage since it wouldn't have any affect on low earners standard of living(better to pay some benefits out to a low wage worker than all benefits to someone unemployed).

Having no minimum wage and paying income support is just a subsidy for low wage employers.  If there is an alternative to paying the bare subsistence to keep their miserables coming back for more abuse day after day, slave-camps like WalMart and McDonalds will just pay a couple of dollars an hour and the public treasury will have to support their work force for them.  (of course in effect now we're already providing them a nearly free work-force at $7/hour or whatever it is, because society is paying for the enormous social problems resulting from such low-wage employment).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.