Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
Posts: 13,285
|
 |
« on: April 30, 2021, 03:52:48 PM » |
|
The new section 6D means there is no reason for the errata to remain separate, yes? The fact that it's separate from all the other sections just makes it confusing; why not just set definitions within sections themselves.
For instance, instead of errata II.C, just change the start of Section 3F to state "votes on Bills and Acts (as defined in section 1C of these rules)". Much simpler - don't pointlessly complicate this and make it harder to read when you're trying to start fresh!
Also, on another note, if the ability to hold votes on upholding a point of order needs to be matched with the ability to hold votes on rejecting one? Or are you saying that if the speaker does
[X], someone brings up a point of order saying no, speaker should have done [Y], and speaker agrees, then someone else can bring up a point of order saying no,
[X]was actually the right choice and hold a vote on that?
|
