Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 13,308
![](./avatars/Other/O_MA.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: January 24, 2018, 01:21:58 PM » |
|
The plan does seem well thought-out. However, I have a major grievance against parliamentary systems which I would like addressed. My number one issue is civil liberties, and I take some comfort in the fact that any government infringement of those liberties needs to pass three separate groups: House majority, Senate majority, and President. In this system, however, any authoritarian anti-Liberty policies could be passed with just 50.001% of the unicameral Parliament.
Also, I feel like the Shadow Cabinet system would discourage newer members, as party leaders would have a tendency to only pick longtime members and personal friends for those positions. And I also fear that being an Independent politician would be much less feasible in this system.
|