Is gillibrand the most cunning politician in America/ the new Lieberman

[Sestak]

All he did was participate in a skit with a former Playboy model and hug a few people. He did nothing compared to those two pigs Trump and Moore or this Trent franks idiot who wanted to pay his female interns 5 million dollars for F***ing surrogacy. Why is it that Republicans get off Scott free for offenses that are borderline criminal while democrats get crucified for hugging people and having their hand accidentally slip on someone's ass. This double standard is going to lead republicans to keep winning elections while democrats rip themselves apart over defending some "Moral high ground" that gets you nowhere electorally. What did "Love trumps hate" and "We go high they go low" do fore Hillary last year? All it did was let trump blow us out while the democrats unilaterally disarmed. The only way we will win again is if we get serious about how you win elections in this country and adopt the same take no prisoners approach the republicans have used to stomp on us since 1980.

"We go high they go low" was an artificial metric about rhetoric. This is a tangible one. We don't have harassers in our party. They have tons of them. You can vote for the Groper Party, or for us. Who's the real "party of law and order"?

Anyway, I refuse to support a party that defends serial harassers like Franken or Conyers.

[Sestak]

Thats one of my favorite political websites, and by the way I thought your not spose to use perfantities on this site someone should report you to the moderators.

I am sick and tired of so-called progressives sweeping sexual harassment under the rug. We can’t claim to be better than the Republicans if we go about and do this kind of shit.

And by all means, report me. The fascistic “perfanity” rules at this place stifle real conversation while neo-Nazis and sexists run rampant around here but nothing gets done about them because they don’t use certain four-letter words despite saying things far more vile than me.

I’ve had a handful of comments deleted or edited just in the Alabama Senate threads because I will not behave respectfully to those who defend pedophiles. I feel similarly about sexual harassers. They are beneath respect - and beneath contempt.

I’m done being nice.

In conclusion: Kirsten Gillibrand has been absolutely right on this issue, and those who seek to undermine her for being right because some on our team get caught up in the consequences are no better than those who defame Donald Trump and Roy Moore’s accusers.

Preach.

[Sestak]

Yeah, remember the time when she was pro-guns when she was in the House but then suddenly became pro-gun control when she got Hillary's seat in the Senate? She won't get my vote in the primaries.

Yeah, Gillibrand does have a sketchy, flip-floppety record overall, and does a lot of virtue signaling. She is, however, completely correct on the harassment issue.

[Sestak]

Yeah, remember the time when she was pro-guns when she was in the House but then suddenly became pro-gun control when she got Hillary's seat in the Senate? She won't get my vote in the primaries.

She represented a rural, swing district in the House and then one f the lost liberal states in the Senate. She’s merely acting as the voice of her constituents.

Did her constituents want her to be the only vote against Mattis?

Also, Presidents don't have constituents.