In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 04:18:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016?  (Read 12680 times)
Sadader
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 285
Botswana


« on: April 24, 2018, 06:44:16 AM »

Hillary Clinton
Logged
Sadader
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 285
Botswana


« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2018, 02:45:13 PM »


So you think they were just doomed to certain defeat against Donald Trump?  LOL

Just because the result happened doesn’t mean that it was predestined. People (for some irrational reason) seem to think that the points

a) Hillary had a better chance of winning than other candidates
and
b) Hillary didn’t win

are mutually exclusive. They’re not. The iteration we got was bad, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the hypothetical iterations of other campaigns would have been better than the average Hillary result, but this is a useless question (for that reason) anyway.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.