Electoral results McCain vs. Clinton compared to McCain vs Obama (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 08:35:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Electoral results McCain vs. Clinton compared to McCain vs Obama (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Electoral results McCain vs. Clinton compared to McCain vs Obama  (Read 536 times)
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


« on: January 10, 2008, 12:03:23 PM »
« edited: January 10, 2008, 12:07:04 PM by agcatter »

It's early I know, but I'm already seeing some clear trends in general election individual state polls.

Clinton runs stronger than Obama in big industrial states like Ohio and Pennsylvania

Rasmussen Pennsylvania:

McCain     48              McCain    46
Clinton     42              Obama    38


Survey USA  Ohio

I don't hardly ever agree with Opedo, but there is a definite racial effect here I believe with regard to blue collar economic Democrats who won't vote for Obama.  I think we saw some of that in the NH Primary in blue collar industrial precincts in Manchester.

McCain     48              McCain    50
Clinton     46              Obama    43

Clinton runs better in border and southern states

Survey USA Kentucky

McCain    51               McCain    54
Clinton    41               Obama    35

Sooner Poll  Oklahoma

McCain beats Clinton by 30, Obama by 40

Survey USA  Alabama

McCain    50              McCain    54
Clinton    43              Obama    36
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2008, 12:14:39 PM »

If you want further proof of what I believe to be the racial effect try this:

Survey USA  Massachusetts (released 12 - 21)

Clinton   53              Obama   47
McCain   43              McCain   43

Again, I know its early and there are other components beside race, but this at least looks suspicious
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2008, 02:08:23 PM »

I'm not sure whether Obama or Hillary can win or not, but I'm definitely glad Warner dropped out.

The only two Democrats elected President in the last 40 years were Carter once, and Bill Clinton twice.  Both were perceived as being somewhat moderate enough as to avoid the tag "liberal" by enough voters to make it across the finish line.  Of course, Carter lost his reelection bid after 4 years governing as a liberal and people realized he was no moderate conservative.  Of course, he gone on to prove he is actually very liberal.

Warner would have been a slam dunk.
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2008, 02:35:14 PM »
« Edited: January 10, 2008, 02:37:28 PM by agcatter »

In 1968, we saw George Wallace with a certain appeal to northern blue collar workers who were normal cogs in the Democratic coalition.  He scored in the very low double digits I believe in Michigan, Pa, and Ohio.  I suspect the same forces are at play here in 2008.  This could be a big problem for him in a general election.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.