I oppose conservatives on any bench.
They don't believe in human rights and "somehow" believe that turning back the clock to a time when women, minorities and lbgt people had very little rights and no liberty is somehow the right time period to dictate current affairs.
Our founders were forward thinkers that wanted to advance human rights and human liberty. Most of them wouldn't want that stalled for hundreds of years and would be in shock to see so many people opposed to basic rights for all. Do you realize that we'd still have slavery today if people didn't fight to change what was considered constitutional? Same could be said about woman's right to vote and basic rights for all.
I respect the constitution as it is a master piece, but realize that its framers wanted to keep progress moving forward. If not, why did they fight against the concept of having a king? and instead chose something very different.
With due respect sir, the supreme court was not intended to be a partisan institution and this hearing is not an appropriate place for partisan politics and ideological bickering.
