Underrated consequence of gerrymandering; weakening bench of opposition party? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 10:33:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Underrated consequence of gerrymandering; weakening bench of opposition party? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Underrated consequence of gerrymandering; weakening bench of opposition party?  (Read 1333 times)
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,799
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
« on: March 13, 2024, 12:13:09 AM »

I think it is just more difficult to be a minority party in a larger state due to the cost of running a campaign in a larger media market.

The states that have decent benches of opposition that aren't swingy include places like Alaska, Montana, Maine, Kansas, or even Vermont... smaller states just have more opportunity.

One place that does seem to fit your hypothesis well in Nevada but that's not necessarily a gerrymander but the odd political geography of the state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.