SENATE BILL: North American Federal Transition Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 10:39:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: North American Federal Transition Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: North American Federal Transition Act (Passed)  (Read 2479 times)
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,022
Australia


« on: November 05, 2019, 07:28:30 PM »

If the South thinks it's unfair then you could just balance it by including Mexico too and splitting it geographically between the South and Fremont.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,022
Australia


« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2019, 02:03:05 AM »

Surly the Federal government should be working on looking after its own citizens rather than imperialistic expansion via trade deals.

Doesn't surprise me to see that Harry "I want Kansas" Truman, wants half of Canada and half of Mexico.

If anything I reckon MB's Plan is probably the most logical if the Federal government is planning on imperialistic expansion via trade deals.

Fremont is by far the smallest region, and always has been, so it's clearly logical that most land should be given to Fremont to try and even up the regional population imbalance.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,022
Australia


« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2019, 07:41:19 AM »

Fremont is by far the smallest region, and always has been, so it's clearly logical that most land should be given to Fremont to try and even up the regional population imbalance.

Why is having the smallest population a bad thing? If anything it means Fremont's voters have greater power in the senate where this bill is currently being discussed.

It means Fremont is in a constant state of inactivity and malaise compared to the other two regions, due to being almost half the size of either the South or Lincoln.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,022
Australia


« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2019, 04:57:01 PM »

There is absolutely no rhyme nor reason for the Atlantic Provinces to illogically be included in the South. The main benefit of also including Mexico is that the South then also gains territory which actually makes geographical sense.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,022
Australia


« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2019, 04:59:44 PM »

Fremont is by far the smallest region, and always has been, so it's clearly logical that most land should be given to Fremont to try and even up the regional population imbalance.

Why is having the smallest population a bad thing? If anything it means Fremont's voters have greater power in the senate where this bill is currently being discussed.

It means Fremont is in a constant state of inactivity and malaise compared to the other two regions, due to being almost half the size of either the South or Lincoln.

More land in game doesn't have anything to do with who registers in game. Nor does it have anything to do with activity.

Well then why don't we allocate the provinces purely geographically. West of Manitoba inclusive goes to Fremont, East of Ontario inclusive goes to Lincoln, the South gets nothing because that would make no sense.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.