Conservatives angry at Airline CEO focusing on DEI policies implying “too many” White men in industr (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 02:01:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Conservatives angry at Airline CEO focusing on DEI policies implying “too many” White men in industr (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Conservatives angry at Airline CEO focusing on DEI policies implying “too many” White men in industr  (Read 3957 times)
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,554
United States


« on: January 16, 2024, 11:04:03 PM »
« edited: January 16, 2024, 11:07:34 PM by 💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his) »

It's really insane to me how there's a large movement of people who point at any shortcoming of an institution in the United States and somehow immediately conclude it's due to "DEI". It's complete nonsense.

The funny thing is people on the left take the dumb pills and, instead of challenging this idiotic premise, instead insist on defending the practice of DEI itself. This thread is a great example! It's so stupid to me that I have to wonder if these complaints are meant as some sort of rhetorical trap to trick liberals into taking a less persuasive argument.

There's no credible evidence connecting "DEI" to any sort of negative change in performance in any of the airline or transportation industries, regardless of whether you think asking your new hires to listen to Robin DiAngelo is a good idea.
Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,554
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2024, 12:55:20 PM »

And you think those are naturally ingrained due to biology/brain chemistry, and not due to socialization?
Why not both?
You sound like a phrenologist

This and other posts you have made in this thread are shameful and embarrassing. You're studying to be a scientist for god's sake.

I'm hesitant to degrade myself by wading into this idiotic debate at all but even if it was entirely due to socialization that doesn't refute that the differences is still real and observable. Once again, progressives really have an incredibly difficult grasp of the is/ought distinction (and don't worry - I'm aware that this one is surely social rather than biological).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.