McDonnell's Thesis (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 09:44:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  McDonnell's Thesis (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McDonnell's Thesis  (Read 6685 times)
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« on: August 31, 2009, 09:40:04 AM »


I don't see this as much of an issue.  He is a Republican, so he will have more conservative views.  As the article itself says, his political career hasn't mirrored this thesis.  Plus, McDonnell was the one who addressed the thesis, rather than Democratic opposition research (sorry Mr. Moderate), so he must not feel that it is a liability.

My question is, is this thesis worse than Sotomayor's "wise Latina" comments?
Logged
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2009, 10:40:43 AM »

It's important to note that McDonnell was 34 when he wrote this too.

True, but it is also important to remember that this was an academic assignment and not a campaign platform or speech, hence the reason why I was comparing it to Sotomayor's speeches.
Logged
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2009, 02:52:20 PM »


Dan,

Reading the article, it says:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I think your comment regarding that she should be impeached under sodomy laws is wrong, at least according to the Post.  Do you have a source for further study on the issue?
Logged
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2009, 03:11:43 PM »


If that is the case then, I don't see where an issue is here for McDonnell.  If she was wilfully breaking the law, it would be difficult to accept her rulings in a legal capacity.  The gay community was probably going to vote against him any way, so there isn't a net loss.  Has Deeds come out saying he would abolish the Sodomy laws in Virginia?  He's been in office for almost two decades, so he must have some sort of legislation on this topic.  If not, then that implies Deeds is also in favor of maintaining the Sodomy laws.
Logged
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2009, 03:40:29 PM »


But that's true with any business.  The lower the teir you are in the pecking order, the more "black and white" you can be.  As you progress, you have to interject more "gray" into the equation.  For example, you call some business to question a fee.  The person that answers will say "I'm sorry, but that's our policy."  So you ask to speak to the manager.  The manager says, "Yes, that is our policy, but I think we have some room to negotiate."  Obama did it, and Bush before him, and so on.  I don't think that is such a bad thing.
Logged
Stampever
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 489
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2009, 06:46:26 PM »

I find it amusing that Stampever is trying to make excuses for this theocrat.

No, just trying to inject some logic into the discussion.  People are acting like if this has been some closet secret and a deal breaker, when much of it is public knowledge already.  I give everyone the benefit of the doubt rather than jumping into partisan talking points.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 9 queries.