Warren compared with Sanders and Clinton (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 12:32:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Warren compared with Sanders and Clinton (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Warren compared with Sanders and Clinton  (Read 2313 times)
TheLeftwardTide
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 988
« on: August 02, 2017, 08:44:27 AM »

I agree with the general idea of most posters here, though a few people are just comically wrong (maga2020, ossoff2028).

One thing I would like to mention is that Warren grew up in a poor family in Oklahoma City, going (almost literally) from rags to riches to become a Massachusetts university professor. This background contrasts very well with Trump, who was more or less born and raised with a silver spoon in his mouth, doing terribly in school but always having his family wealth to fall back on, acting like sort of impenetrable social safety net. If this difference is highlighted enough, then Warren could really tap into the working class demographics of all races.

At this stage, I would enthusiastically vote for Warren in a primary.
Logged
TheLeftwardTide
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 988
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2017, 02:04:12 PM »

Clearly people don't care Trump was born with a silver spoon in his mouth since he won over WWC.
Plenty can change in four years, especially after being directly impacted by Trump's incompetence.

Hillary spent more time attacking trump than focusing on the issues. I hope whoever is the 2020 nominee does not focus on attacking Trump like Hillary and the republicans in primary did since it failed.
This is a mixed bag. Hillary's big mistake was attacking Trump over the wrong things, mainly being unprofessional. Oh no, Trump said something controversial about a model! How devastating! I think most of the WWC just don't care about that type of thing. Instead, Hillary should have attacked Trump over his business ties with the Saudis, or his own outsourcing of jobs, or his own political donors. To her credit, she did a little bit, but it was on the side, when it should have been the focus of her attacks.

Another thing, too; why is it that over half of your posts (9/17) are replies to something I have said? I find that interesting.
Logged
TheLeftwardTide
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 988
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2017, 08:01:08 PM »

No idea. I'll make sure I don't reply to you anymore.
I didn't mean it like that. I actually find discussing such subjects with you quite interesting, since you usually bring up good points. It trains my debating and reasoning skills. I was wondering out of curiosity.

Other than that, I suppose you do give a good point. So then it's Warren's job to highlight her background if she decides to run in 2020. Trump didn't seem at all like the type of guy who would run a protectionist/faux-populist campaign back in 2013, but he did anyway.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.