Oh good. This is the guy I wanted (in a meaningless race).
Why exactly did you want this guy?
He wasn't Estabrook.
Estabrook is even worse than this guy?? I don't know much about him, but what makes Estabrook worse?
Just a poor candidate and seemed RINOesque.
How exactly is running someone who is Rhinoesque worse than running Pennachio in New Jersey??
Ok, first off it's "RINO." Secondly, who cares? Pennacchio won't win. Estabrook wouldn't have won. Why should I have supported a RINO, which goes against what I believe in, in a race we'll lose anyway especially when it's not even my own U.S. Senate race?
Finally, you're missing the point that she was just a bad candidate anyway. She didn't know how to handle herself when it came to debating the issues.
From this it looks as if Estabrook would have played better than Pennachio in New Jersey, and she could have self-funded her campaign. I predict Lautenberg will probably win about 56%-42%, give or take a little.
