2000: was this ever a realistic possibility (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 31, 2024, 09:48:11 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion

U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)

2000: was this ever a realistic possibility (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

....

#1 yes, very possible.		5 (14.3%)
#2 possible, but unlikely		24 (68.6%)
#3 impossible. bush could never win by losing the 'trifecta' (mi, pa, fl)		6 (17.1%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author

Topic: 2000: was this ever a realistic possibility (Read 4395 times)

Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member

Posts: 3,403

Re: 2000: was this ever a realistic possibility

« on: July 14, 2006, 04:47:31 PM »

Quote from: Nym90 on July 11, 2006, 11:53:01 PM

Quote from: Inks.LWC on June 20, 2006, 12:53:07 AM

I'd say WA, TN, AR, and WV were pretty far off--but other than that, realistic. If anybody cares, here was mine, but it was pretty bad (percentages were 24/50, but states were 46/50):

I see 7 states that were wrong: NH, MD, WI, MN, IA, CO, and NM.

I'm really not being critical but I'm just interested. Why did you think Bush would carry Maryland and Gore would win Colorado? I can see the other state predictions that were wrong.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.