2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 08:29:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread  (Read 174691 times)
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
« on: April 08, 2021, 12:21:42 PM »
« edited: April 08, 2021, 01:01:08 PM by The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow »

The DCCC released its offensive target list for 2022 yesterday:



It's obviously a much more limited list of seats (mostly just close losses in 2020), though there are a few districts that seem like possible redistricting targets - as well as ignoring several seats where redistricting will take once competitive seats off the table.

The four California seats and TX-24 are by far the five easiest targets on the list (not counting AZ-02, which shouldn't really be on there to begin with). I have an extremely hard time seeing any of the others flipping in a neutral or GOP-favorable midterm, aside from NY redistricting shaking things up there.
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2021, 11:44:09 AM »

Sabato put out an interesting article on how they'd hypothetically rate House seats if the same lines were being used in 2022:





Not a terrible list, but there are a few eyebrow-raising choices. For one, I don't see how you can justify classifying NY-24 as Lean R when they are clearly (and reasonably) assuming a GOP-friendly national environment.

CA-25 and CA-39 certainly would be the first two Democratic pickups, though. You could make an argument to move TX-24 to the tossup category as well, simply given the district's trajectory and van Duyne's personal controversies. Having TX-24 and NY-24 in the same category is pretty absurd.
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2022, 08:17:56 PM »

I don't agree with PA-07 being Lean R. Even in this environment, Wild is a strong incumbent and Scheller already lost in 2020 and nearly lost her primary this year to an unknown opponent despite having unlimited cash
Under the new Redistricting Lines drawn PA-7 is waaay more Republican compared to 2020. You have to take this into account too.

It's only Trump by a few points isn't it? Where it was Biden by a few in 2020? I don't think it changed that dramatically where it still wouldn't be a toss-up. This is a tough year for Wild in a semi-tougher district but Scheller is not a great candidate.

It went from Biden +5 to Biden +1
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.