Wisconsin Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 02:33:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Wisconsin Megathread (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Author Topic: Wisconsin Megathread  (Read 290888 times)
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #25 on: December 07, 2017, 07:55:41 AM »

So Wisconsin posters: If you had to put money on it right now, does Walker win re-election?
Tossup, but I'm gonna predict that Evers pulls it out. He's the best that Wisconsin Dems have. Republicans/conservatives have lackluster numbers here and Democrats/liberals have good numbers.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #26 on: December 16, 2017, 03:11:43 PM »

Since i live in the district next to SD 10, I have been hearing radio ads for the republican primary. pretty typical stuff other than Zimmerman has been running attack ads against Jarchow for not being 100% loyal to walker. i do see that Jarchow has locked up most of the endorsements from current and former elected officials including the third HD Rep in SD 10.
What's so interesting about SD 10, exactly?
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #27 on: December 26, 2017, 11:40:03 PM »
« Edited: December 27, 2017, 01:58:47 AM by mcmikk »

Well well well....turns out Scott Walker's Foxconn boondoggle will now cost $4.5 billion (up from $3 billion). Bye bye Walker

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Let's hope. This deal is so unbelievably trash and I hope it brings Walker down so we can get a liberal in there that isn't gonna give away 4 billion dollars to a foreign corporation. We won't even break even on this investment for several decades at best.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #28 on: December 27, 2017, 01:59:01 AM »

Well well well....turns out Scott Walker's Foxconn boondoggle will now cost $4.5 billion (up from $3 billion). Bye bye Walker

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Walker is such an idiot

From the party of fiscal responsibility, my dudes.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2017, 07:47:08 PM »

WI Dems should really run on investing in rural infastructure and schools. Walker has won by using rural resentment pitting urban vs. rural while not actually doing anything for rural communities.
This, with particular focus on the large strip of Obama-Trump counties in Western Wisconsin.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #30 on: December 28, 2017, 09:26:06 PM »

WI Dems should really run on investing in rural infastructure and schools. Walker has won by using rural resentment pitting urban vs. rural while not actually doing anything for rural communities.
This, with particular focus on the large strip of Obama-Trump counties in Western Wisconsin.

Evers/Vinehout ticket needs to be in the works, like, yesterday.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #31 on: January 11, 2018, 07:20:32 PM »

A new poll just released by PPP has Evers leading the field at 29%, with the second best(Vinehout) at 11%. 28% are undecided.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #32 on: January 11, 2018, 07:45:18 PM »

Evers/Vinehout teaming up would probably be the strongest option for Dems, right?

Yeah, I'd say so. Problem is, Wisconsin doesn't have running mates. The primaries for Governor and Lieutenant Governor are separate, and the winners run on the same general election ticket.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #33 on: January 11, 2018, 09:36:34 PM »

Evers/Vinehout teaming up would probably be the strongest option for Dems, right?

Yeah, I'd say so. Problem is, Wisconsin doesn't have running mates. The primaries for Governor and Lieutenant Governor are separate, and the winners run on the same general election ticket.

Any chance she drops down?

And who's running for Lt. Governor, anyway?

3 people, the most notable imo being Mandela Barnes, a former State Rep. I don't really know much about any of them.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #34 on: January 12, 2018, 07:35:18 AM »

Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #35 on: January 16, 2018, 02:37:06 PM »

Evers' fundraising numbers are in. He currently boasts "2400+" donors, an average donation of $85.23, donors from 71 of Wisconsin's 72 counties, with 94% of his donations coming from Wisconsin. He's currently raised $312,000 without loaning his campaign any money.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #36 on: January 16, 2018, 10:48:42 PM »

If the Governor's election goes anything like SD-10 went today, Walker is done.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #37 on: January 22, 2018, 08:14:14 PM »

I wonder how many Walker/Baldwin voters there's going to be in the WOW counties. I'm also curious if there's going to end up being more there or in the rurals.

That will be interesting to see, if there are any. Walker hasn't exactly distanced himself from Trump. He wanks Trump off constantly ever since he won the nomination. That said, I'm thinking there will be more in WOW than in rural areas, unless the Gov nominee ends up being Paul Soglin or someone like that. But it won't, it will be Evers. Walker was successfully able to prey on rural-urban resentment in previous campaigns, but since Evers isn't from Madison or Milwaukee, and is generally pretty inoffensive and seems like a guy that can communicate with rural voters particularly in Western Wisconsin. As for Baldwin, she has her own strengths and she's pretty good in Western Wisconsin so I'm thinking she and Evers will get similar margins there.

TLDR chances are if Baldwin does significantly better than Evers, it will be because of ticket splitters in WOW. That's my hunch.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2018, 07:49:08 AM »

I'm having a tough time picturing what sort of Milwaukee suburban voter voted for Bush twice, voted for McCain and Romney, and voted for Walker three times amongst all that, but then considered Trump a bridge too far and is now voting against all Republicans because of that.

Ones in WOW, where Ron Johnson outperformed Trump by roughly 30,000 votes in 2016, and in a midterm where upballot trends will start to translate downballot. See: Arkansas Senate Election, 2010.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #39 on: February 20, 2018, 06:08:00 PM »

If I had to guess, I'd say Burns places 1st, though I'm not sure about who else advances.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #40 on: February 20, 2018, 06:19:57 PM »

Burns has run an interesting campaign. He's been a very open liberal progressive Democrat, and makes no bones about it. He openly derides the notion that the judicial is an apolitical, nonpartisan entity, and that that thinking is what caused all these right-wing judges to get in there in the first place. I admire his boldness, and his offbeat, unorthodox campaign is very appealing to me, potentially because it reminds me of someone I am a bit fond of Wink

Needless to say, I'll be rooting for him. I'm excited to see progressives finally start taking back the state Supreme Court. It would be great to see the two liberals advance and the horrendous WI GOP gets locked out of the General, but at the same time it would be nice to see the conservative get smacked in a head-to-head.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #41 on: February 20, 2018, 06:20:28 PM »


Polls close at 9 PM EST.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #42 on: February 20, 2018, 09:22:26 PM »

Live results by county available here.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #43 on: February 20, 2018, 09:48:47 PM »

Journal Sentinel calls it for Dallet and Screnock.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #44 on: February 20, 2018, 09:50:02 PM »

So is Screnock gonna get pinned under 50 or not?

Most likely, but even if he got to 50% there would be a runoff anyway.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #45 on: February 20, 2018, 09:51:26 PM »

So is Screnock gonna get pinned under 50 or not?

Most likely, but even if he got to 50% there would be a runoff anyway.

IK, but I just wanna see dems win the majority of the pv in the state again.

True. I think they will.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #46 on: February 20, 2018, 09:55:52 PM »

I'm making a county map of which party got the majority. Dems have already flipped Kenosha county from 2016, and it look like they're outperforming Clinton by a lot in western WI.

Pretty much every Wisconsin Dem will. Clinton was uniquely awful for rural areas, including the swingy Driftless Region, Western WI. Hell, Feingold won 6 Trump counties in 2016.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #47 on: February 20, 2018, 09:56:43 PM »

Piss poor Milwaukee County turnout that Dallet will need to address in the runoff. If she can get more voters to turnout there she has it in the bag in April

She'll probably have it in the bag regardless.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #48 on: February 21, 2018, 07:44:06 AM »



Here is what the combo map looks like now. I'm going to bed, hopefully we're at 100% by the time I wake up.

Looks good, this is about what Democrats need to win statewide. As important as turnout in Madison and Milwaukee are, Driftless pretty much decides elections here.
Logged
mcmikk
thealmightypiplup
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 681


« Reply #49 on: February 21, 2018, 05:19:56 PM »


Should be Dallet. She did really well in the Driftless region.

What's really impressive to me, frankly, is Dane County. Yes, the liberals combined did really well out west, but Dane turned in an 83-17 liberal win with 25% turnout. That's outstanding.

Yeah, especially in an election where turnout is expected in the single digits--all good signs.

Yep. Dane County has plenty of #Resistance types who are fired up and you can bet that turnout will be pretty juiced up there in the General as well.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 10 queries.