Whether it be Nate COhn, harry enten, nate silver, the wapo, nyt, or most journalists and writers for those papers, you could always tell they were distrustful at best, and openly hostile at worst, of bernie during the primary.
My question is why? Journalism, at least in the past, has always aligned itself with muckraking and exposing the corruption of those in power.
Bernie seemed like a good compliment to such sentiments.
In what sense?
In the sense that they thought he probably wouldn't win? In the sense that they thought his campaign was low on substance? Or in the sense of mythical media bias?