As a person she had many toxic relationships and was prone to contradictions.
I have more of an issue with the living Ayn Rand Institute 'heirs' like Leonard Peikoff and Yaron Brook.
If they are not talking about foreign policy I agree with a lot of what the Ayn Rand even current Objectivists are saying on topics in general (minimum wage, government regulation, central banking, economic freedom, sound money, etc). The Ayn Rand lexicon is a nice summary of her own non-fiction writing on topics like liberals, socialism, etc. She definitely is a lot more convincing and acerbic in her own non-fiction writing than Peikoff, Schwartz, etc.
I think she would loathe Trump - I would say he is like a pre-Roark meeting Gail Wynand (Fountainhead) mixed with a little of the President Robinson figurehead from Atlas. Definitely a pull peddler of the first order. She would hate Clinton too perhaps even worse for that matter but the ARI endorsed Clinton. Idiots.
Some of the philosophy is lacking refinement and self-awareness and the ability to acknowledge the lack of reason in some of the policy positions they take.
If they only followed the 'rational' nature of their philosophy perhaps they would see calls for a pre-emptive strike on Iran as a bad idea and the near blind support of the pro-Israeli government position one to step back from.