Since I fit in neither camp, I must assume I am a "moderate". Haha
For reference I am a 30 year old white male. I live in the rural south. I work in the Flexographic Printing industry. I am a practicing Southern Baptist. I favor lower taxes, sound money, less regulation on business, looser gun laws, and marijuana legalization. I am moderately pro life and it doesn't bother me if gay couples get married.
Though if you ask certain people based on following the 'Blood and Soil' Mises Institute, agreeing with forcible removal (taken completely out of context and neglecting to mention it would be in a hypothetical voluntary covenant situation), or agreeing with public figures who refuse to sign a pledge to 'resist fascism' you and I may be one step away from outright fascism according to people in our own party - moderate RINO Bill Weld supporter types and libertarian socialists mostly - for not disowning far-right libertarians like Hans Hermann Hoppe, Tom Woods, Lew Rockwell, Jeff Deist, and even Ron Paul.
I personally don't find someone peddling influence with key corporations and industries as strictly 'free market' individual - more corporatist. As what they are doing is a form of 'bourgeois socialism' as a political philosopher called the public private dance. It is a part of the game, every corporation has to have their person in Washington and the state capitals.
Establishment 'free market/corporatists' of the top group of the two 'far right categories the OP mention play it just as much as the corporate dems and the 'compassionate conservatives' of the Kasich / Snyder mold despite occasional plays to the spirit of Milton Friedman or FA Hayek a Mike Lee or Ted Cruz will make with a relatively risk-free bill or speech from time to time.
