Business wants a Universal Basic Income. Which party will give it to them? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:28:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Business wants a Universal Basic Income. Which party will give it to them? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Business wants a Universal Basic Income. Which party will give it to them?  (Read 573 times)
The Self
Rookie
**
Posts: 202
« on: June 19, 2017, 03:25:59 PM »

At least here it's catching like the flu among the business owners I know, most of whom take their marching orders from people like Elon Musk.

I would have said that the Republicans were a shoe-in to write the bill that eventually becomes the UBI programme in America, on the basis that we prefer Republican-crafted policy generally when it comes to social programmes. But Trump has probably made this impossible.

That leaves the Democrats. The Sanders wing can't be allowed to actually draft the UBI, but its support base will be necessary to pass it all the same. Whichever Democrat can thread this particular needle will, I think, be the next President.
Logged
The Self
Rookie
**
Posts: 202
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2017, 03:27:27 PM »
« Edited: June 19, 2017, 03:32:15 PM by The Self »

What a lazy way to deal with poverty.

We don't want it to deal with poverty. The point is to ensure steady margins during downturns, which are increasingly likely.
Logged
The Self
Rookie
**
Posts: 202
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2017, 03:34:22 PM »
« Edited: June 19, 2017, 03:36:49 PM by The Self »

Our government couldn't possibly afford UBI unless they tax the living hell out of Musk and company. Something they probably wouldn't support.

Eventually the programme ought to be privatized. Ideally it would include a phase-out provision shifting it entirely into the private-sector, as a consciously designed charity. The purpose of government involvement would be only to legitimize it and to get it through the first few years.
Logged
The Self
Rookie
**
Posts: 202
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2017, 03:41:41 PM »

What a lazy way to deal with poverty.

We don't want it to deal with poverty. The point is to ensure steady margins during downturns, which are increasingly likely.
Which is just as well achieved by a stimulus.

As 'shovel ready' showed, stimulus packages are not efficient, and nobody is going to die on that hill after the experience of the last one. The only reason stimulus packages are even necessary is because of institutional short-termism.
Logged
The Self
Rookie
**
Posts: 202
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2017, 03:51:50 PM »

I was thinking more of stimulus Bush did, where everyone got a check.

Didn't work, and will be increasingly unpalatable in the coming years politically. A private UBI is the only surefire guarantee for stability during economic downturns.

We want it, and we mean to have it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.