Would you support multi-member districts in this situation? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 02:58:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Would you support multi-member districts in this situation? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Yes
#2
No
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Would you support multi-member districts in this situation?  (Read 288 times)
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,991


« on: August 14, 2023, 09:12:43 PM »
« edited: August 14, 2023, 09:16:47 PM by Oryxslayer »

How many votes would you get? In Idaho and Arizona, which do have MMD districts, you get two votes cause you are electing two candidates. In this instance that would just mean two White guys.





And the alternative can still be a bad outcome. These are Forsyth and Cumberland County NC Commissioner maps. Both initially At-large, both forced to provide access for minorities. Both Reliably Blue. Both of their AA districts elect 2, the outer seats elect 4 in Forsyth and 3 in Cumberland. There are also a handful of at-large seats that do reflect the overall lean, which are the only reason neither have been sued for such maps. In Cumberland the outer district is Biden +1.6 and 50% white, in Forsyth is Trump+0.8 and 70.7% White. In this way minority voters are packed into only having influence over a minuity of seats, and only the Cumberland gerrymander has started to see Dems get elected to the outer district through crossover support.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.