John James raises 3 million dollars in Q3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 07:08:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  John James raises 3 million dollars in Q3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: John James raises 3 million dollars in Q3  (Read 1647 times)
Los Angeles Swag Boss
L.A. Da Boss
Rookie
**
Posts: 70
United States


« on: October 07, 2019, 10:23:35 PM »

Good. Excited to see this money go down the drain.

Love how everyone thinks this race is close. Peters is a better electorally AND in July had half the money Stabenow raised at the end of the election.... Don't think this one is going to be anywhere as close as people think.
Logged
Los Angeles Swag Boss
L.A. Da Boss
Rookie
**
Posts: 70
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2019, 11:51:26 PM »

For those of you thinking that Peters up 19 is crazy in a race where John James is not widely known, in a state that is lean Democrat, during the time of an unpopular GOP President, and when the incumbent has no reason to lose the "incumbency advantage" that he has.....

And instead thinks that it would be impossible for Michigan can be a double digit state.

I give you one picture:



Logged
Los Angeles Swag Boss
L.A. Da Boss
Rookie
**
Posts: 70
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2019, 11:53:37 PM »

For those of you thinking that Peters up 19 is crazy in a race where John James is not widely known, in a state that is lean Democrat, during the time of an unpopular GOP President, and when the incumbent has no reason to lose the "incumbency advantage" that he has.....

And instead thinks that it would be impossible for Michigan can be a double digit state.

I give you one picture:





And let me clarify, I'm not saying that John James will lose by double digits OR Peters will do better than Whitmer.

All I'm saying is that it's very possible that James is down 19% (considering the MOE) -- and that's not easy to catch up with at all.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.