HOUSE BILL: Atlasian Transportation Access Act (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:18:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  HOUSE BILL: Atlasian Transportation Access Act (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HOUSE BILL: Atlasian Transportation Access Act (Failed)  (Read 2543 times)
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« on: March 14, 2018, 12:13:29 PM »

does anyone have any potential edits.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2018, 04:29:49 PM »

While I agree that this bill could be wonderful with enough work, this seems more like a bill that is best submitted at the regional level, as the federal government doesn't have the authority to actually do this.

On top of that, there are concerns about how much this costs and how it is funded. Is it coming from the existing Department of Transportation budget? Because that could take away from much more important work such as improving highway infrastructure, improving safety regulations, etc. And if it adds to DoT spending, where does the money come from? (which going back to my previous point, is something that should be asked if the regions take it up, since the federal government can't do what this bill is trying to do).
this bill was modeled to give regions most of the power over deciding the specifics, and split the bill about 60/40 region/federal, which I clumsily left out. I'll add the section.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2018, 04:49:19 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Atlasian People's House of Representatives
pending


Sponsor: Politicalmasta73
House Designation: HB 1201
[/quote]
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2018, 05:08:05 PM »

While I agree that this bill could be wonderful with enough work, this seems more like a bill that is best submitted at the regional level, as the federal government doesn't have the authority to actually do this.

On top of that, there are concerns about how much this costs and how it is funded. Is it coming from the existing Department of Transportation budget? Because that could take away from much more important work such as improving highway infrastructure, improving safety regulations, etc. And if it adds to DoT spending, where does the money come from? (which going back to my previous point, is something that should be asked if the regions take it up, since the federal government can't do what this bill is trying to do).
this bill was modeled to give regions most of the power over deciding the specifics, and split the bill about 60/40 region/federal, which I clumsily left out. I'll add the section.

Cutting the price of bus fares/setting the price is something that the federal government doesn't have the authority to do. That's something that would be decided at regional/local levels.
Says who? I guess I could let the regions decide exactly the percentage discount.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2018, 05:04:23 PM »

ANy thoughts on me forming this into a subsidy bill for private companies to reek the rewards of?
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2018, 09:12:20 PM »

The subsidies don't necessarily have to go to the bus companies directly (and remember a number of them are municipal and state owned as well). You could have a system like Food stamps that follows the person if that makes sense. This is also similar to the way that we did healthcare and that way, the companies still have to provide decent service because they aren't assured to get that money.



I agree with this plan.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2018, 10:48:00 PM »

The subsidies don't necessarily have to go to the bus companies directly (and remember a number of them are municipal and state owned as well). You could have a system like Food stamps that follows the person if that makes sense. This is also similar to the way that we did healthcare and that way, the companies still have to provide decent service because they aren't assured to get that money.

Even with this considered, this bill still seems like something that is better suited for regional legislature rather than handled at the federal level.
the bill is modeled to give region the control.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2018, 11:12:42 PM »

The subsidies don't necessarily have to go to the bus companies directly (and remember a number of them are municipal and state owned as well). You could have a system like Food stamps that follows the person if that makes sense. This is also similar to the way that we did healthcare and that way, the companies still have to provide decent service because they aren't assured to get that money.

Even with this considered, this bill still seems like something that is better suited for regional legislature rather than handled at the federal level.
the bill is modeled to give region the control.

This bill has the Federal government covering 60% of the cost and setting the prices of bus fares. The only thing it gives the regions is that they only cover 40% of the cost and they get to set environmental criteria. That's not giving the regions control. 
alright

with that, I have
- make it subsidies
give regions more control

anything else?
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2018, 02:16:00 AM »

I'll object on behalf of the house members who wanna make edits. A couple days or so.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2018, 03:33:38 PM »

I motion for a vote to table. This bill's flaws are too major to be fixed within its own means.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2018, 03:43:32 PM »

I am in the process of rewriting it.

I ay be able to avoid a table vote.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #11 on: April 01, 2018, 03:42:26 PM »

Section 1: Title and Definitions
1. The long title of this act shall be the ”Atlasian Transportation Access Act" It may be cited as the “Atlasian Transportation Act”
2. For the purposes of this act, “Transportation" shall refer to buses primarily.

Section 2: Funding And Discounts
1.Each Citizen will be provided with a voucher of 20 USD a month to be spent specifically on bus passes.
2.If you choose not to take this voucher, you can turn it in each month for a 15 USD tax credit.
3. This will be paid for by The Department of Transportation.


Section 4: Bus Standards
1. All buses must meet certain environmental criteria, set by individual regions.


Section 5: Time of Enactment: This bill will take effect immediately after it passes.Section 1: Title and Definitions
1. The long title of this act shall be the ”Atlasian Transportation Access Act" It may be cited as the “Atlasian Transportation Act”
2. For the purposes of this act, “Transportation" shall refer to buses primarily.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2018, 09:04:58 AM »

Yep
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2018, 06:35:58 PM »

Could the sponsor indicate what is being changed from the previous text?
It has been changed to a voucher system
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2018, 02:18:01 PM »

This amendment is clearly a massive waste of money, as a huge majority of our citizens don't use buses.  As well as possibly giving EVERY CITIZEN 15 DOLLARS A MONTH?!?!  That's insane, especially with the current deficit we have.  I strongly encourage the house to vote against this amendment.
actually, how about I change it so its based on salary and qualifications? that would cut out the 15 dollars a month and would distribute it to only the people who need it. Also, we need to wait for the gm to run the numbers before we know how expensive it is.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2018, 09:57:22 AM »

I am very very sorry, but I am objecting.

I didn't really think this out, and the senator made some fair points, I am motioning for a vote to able, as while I think this would be a great bill, we need to get ourselves out of the deficit, and that should be a top priority.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #16 on: April 11, 2018, 03:19:15 PM »

I am attempting to withdraw.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


« Reply #17 on: April 14, 2018, 08:47:44 PM »

abstain.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 11 queries.