Redistricter Discussion and Map Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 11:06:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Redistricter Discussion and Map Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Redistricter Discussion and Map Thread  (Read 4776 times)
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,763


« on: July 04, 2023, 09:43:04 AM »

Some of the youths in my office are already pushing to get a company subscription to this. The education data alone is near-revolutionary for polling purposes!

Also very helpful to finally have a "database" of sorts for primary election results by district.
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,763


« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2023, 10:40:53 AM »

Does anyone know why Inner NOVA trended right in 2020? By this I mean Arlington + Alexandria + Falls Church area + McLean. Splitting the core NOVA counties (Loudoun, Fairfax, PW and all those that lie within) in two, you can yield a half where Trump got a higher percentage of the two party vote in 2020 than he did in 2016. That area is basically Inner Nova + east PWC.

It's not like the two halves are all that much different.

Half one: Clinton +51, Biden +50, 15% Black, 14% Asian, 19% Latino, 61% College Educated, $154k MHI

Half two: Clinton +23, Biden +32, 9% Black, 19% Asian, 16% Latino, 60% College Educated, $175k MHI.

Obviously the first half is more Black/Latino and less Asian, but not hugely. It has higher educational attainment and lower income, which would usually cause a greater D swing.

My thought is that Clinton really embodied a well off professional type and that played well in the rich areas of NOVA plus she did better with non-Whites. This is a place that would've swung basically everywhere else though.



In general deeply blue areas trended right likely due to the very high voter turnout we saw

I haven't seen a full deep dive of the hard data yet, but it appears likely that Republicans in safe Dem areas (like this one) were more likely than Republicans elsewhere to utilize voting accessibility measures in 2020, potentially adding to this.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.