Donna Brazile: How the Clinton campaign ran the DNC (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 12:33:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Donna Brazile: How the Clinton campaign ran the DNC (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Donna Brazile: How the Clinton campaign ran the DNC  (Read 13493 times)
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« on: November 02, 2017, 10:10:37 AM »
« edited: November 02, 2017, 10:14:16 AM by RFKFan68 »

Sounds like an interesting read. Hillary ended up on a lot of people who were loyal to her’s sh**t lists after she fumbled the election.

ETA: and this should end the peculiar Hillary 2020 speculation. She is toast. While I still think Bernie was going to lose, this looks horrible especially with a Clinton hack (she lost her job at CNN over Hillary) being the one to tell this story.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2017, 01:53:22 PM »

For the life of me I still don't understand what is meant by "rigged" primaries. No votes were changed. It just sounds like it was the debate scheduling, superdelegates committing long beforehand (which is irrelevant because Clinton still won by delegates), and a bunch of random talk among DNC staff that never amounted to anything. What else is there? This sketchy fundraising structure using states as pass through entities isn't right but it doesn't have anything to do with Bernie's votes.

This isn't to say the DNC wasn't being shady and untrustworthy, though. I'm just not sure I like the terminology here, because a lot of people seem to level charges on the DNC that describe something that wasn't happening. I can't tell you how many times I've seen people say the DNC actually stole the nomination from Sanders, when it is more like just working against him on the periphery.

All I can say is they really need to clean this mess up by 2020. Just let the candidates run on an even playing field, and stop trying to control everything. At the very least they should understand that they are too incompetent to tilt a primary against their disfavored candidates and get away with it.
At the end of the day when Hillary Clinton is in the center of the scandal you can’t scrub the appearance of corruption off. Any sort of context and nuance that takes longer than 15 seconds to explain is looked at with disdain and as lying. The best the Democrats can do is to move on and work on providing transparent primaries with even playing fields.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2017, 03:24:23 PM »

This is beyond pathetic coming from Brazile.  Didn't she get fired for leaking debate questions to Hillary?
She’s bitter because at least when CNN fired her she had a cushy position in Hillary’s White House waiting on her. Clearly that didn’t come to fruition.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2017, 10:36:09 PM »

How is "Undemocratic" to ask people to engage & talk over an election?
Hillary supporters have jobs. They didn't have 12 hours out of the day to sit around defending their vote and being shouted down by Bernie supporters.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2017, 04:57:29 PM »

How is "Undemocratic" to ask people to engage & talk over an election?
Hillary supporters have jobs. They didn't have 12 hours out of the day to sit around defending their vote and being shouted down by Bernie supporters.

That’s exactly what Republicans love to say. Nice.
I was being facetious.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2017, 05:00:58 PM »

How is "Undemocratic" to ask people to engage & talk over an election?
Hillary supporters have jobs. They didn't have 12 hours out of the day to sit around defending their vote and being shouted down by Bernie supporters.

Uh, I thought I read somewhere that Sanders' primary voters were often higher income than Hillary's...
The jobs part was an (attempted) joke. The second part of my statement is true. Bernie supporters did yell at Hillary supporters at caucuses. My friend’s mother experienced this in Nevada. His supporters were more passionate, which is great, but he did benefit from the caucus system which is undemocratic. He often left this out when he went on tirades Against the “system”.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2017, 05:15:31 PM »

Elizabeth Warren’s pandering was for naught.

She can kiss my potential vote goodbye.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2017, 05:00:31 PM »

So Hillary had complete control over the DNC but Brazile was going to forcibly remove her off the ticket two months before the election? This woman is bat sh-t.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.