SR 113-67: Adequate Consideration Resolution (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 01:27:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SR 113-67: Adequate Consideration Resolution (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SR 113-67: Adequate Consideration Resolution (Passed)  (Read 1438 times)
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,010
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22

« on: February 23, 2023, 07:32:44 PM »

Nay
Logged
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,010
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22

« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2023, 10:05:45 AM »

Aye
Logged
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,010
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22

« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2023, 11:50:56 AM »
« Edited: February 27, 2023, 11:56:43 AM by West_Midlander »

Aye.

I have heard the complaint that sometimes multiple laws are relevant in a repeal/reform effort but this bill doesn't prevent that. It only says that there needs to be a broad consensus (2/3rds support) to achieve that.
Logged
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,010
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22

« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2023, 03:57:11 PM »

This is a depraved act by the Senate-you better hope we don't remember your bad faith when the Labor Party has a majority again with high-quality Senators!

If high-quality means people who vote in this body regularly, or who ever post more than just Aye or Nay at the party's insistence, it's doubtful that will ever happen.

Also, PSA for anyone Pericles sweet-talked: The majority constituted by Labor and its "allies" is of, by, and for the Labor Party, not any of their supposed allies or the Atlasian people, according to Pericles.

He either wants a solid Labor majority without any other parties taking part, or he views a partnership with Labor as being in Labor.
Logged
West_Midlander
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,010
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 1.22

« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2023, 04:05:43 PM »

This is a depraved act by the Senate-you better hope we don't remember your bad faith when the Labor Party has a majority again with high-quality Senators!

If high-quality means people who vote in this body regularly, or who ever post more than just Aye or Nay at the party's insistence, it's doubtful that will ever happen.

Also, PSA for anyone Pericles sweet-talked: The majority constituted by Labor and its "allies" is of, by, and for the Labor Party, not any of their supposed allies or the Atlasian people, according to Pericles.

He either wants a solid Labor majority without any other parties taking part, or he views a partnership with Labor as being in Labor.

This is a lame attack-of course I want more Senators to be in my political party, as do you.

You shouldn't talk about people as if you know them if you don't. A Federalist-alone majority would probably be less ideologically aligned with me than a split Senate. You're either lying or willfully ignorant to suggest I'm a solid partisan.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 10 queries.