Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 11:33:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was the Democratic establishment so united behind Clinton in the beginning?  (Read 3286 times)
PoliticalShelter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 407
« on: May 29, 2017, 04:27:26 PM »

Because it was widely believed that Clinton was a very good candidate and seemed to possess high approval numbers throughout 2013/2014. Also when she got behind the Obama campaign in 2008, it was widely believed by most that in return for an Undivided party, Hillary was to be a shoe in for the 2016 democrat presidential nominee.
Logged
PoliticalShelter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 407
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2017, 10:30:30 AM »

Yeah The democrats only really began to collapse outside of their blue enclaves over the Obama years, the party was remained strong in the rural Midwest and the south throughout the Clinton presidency.

If anything it seems the democrats collapse throughout much of the country has less to do with the embrace of third way economics and more to do with the party fully embracing cultural liberalism, which is more to do with Obama than the Clintons.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.