which is a bigger liability (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 07:04:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  which is a bigger liability (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: which is a bigger liability  (Read 3696 times)
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« on: February 20, 2012, 11:41:42 PM »
« edited: February 20, 2012, 11:44:09 PM by Politico »

In Romney's defense, he was running against a Kennedy in Massachusetts.

In Santorum's defense, he was running against a Casey in Pennsylvania.

Ted Kennedy was, for better or worse, a national icon. Bob Casey is just the bald son of a famous Governor. Nobody outside of Pennsylvania knows him.

Furthermore, Romney's '94 campaign was almost solely funded by his own pocket. Santorum was the darling of K Street, and even those bucks couldn't keep him from joining George McGovern among the ranks of incumbent Senators who lost by nearly twenty points.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2012, 10:02:13 AM »

Santorum's. Romney lost in Massachusetts to a Kennedy (and what's more, the one who was basically the public face of American liberalism for 30 years).

Exactly. The only people on here who would argue otherwise are clearly too young to understand how big Ted Kennedy was with regards to American liberalism. Ted Kennedy was to the liberal wing of the Democratic Party what Ronald Reagan was/is to the conservative wing of the Republican Party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.