Does Gingrich have a third hilarious collapse up his sleeve? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:15:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Does Gingrich have a third hilarious collapse up his sleeve? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does Gingrich have a third hilarious collapse up his sleeve?  (Read 1555 times)
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« on: April 21, 2012, 03:36:18 PM »

That troll still having Secret Service protection is a great example of the Obama Administration's wasteful ways.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2012, 04:58:59 PM »
« Edited: April 21, 2012, 05:02:55 PM by Politico »

That troll still having Secret Service protection is a great example of the Obama Administration's wasteful ways.

Obama is not determining Secret Service procedures for presidential candidates protection.

What next? Are you going to blame your phimosis on Obama administration as well?

The Secret Service is a part of the executive branch of the federal government, and therefore is under the leadership of the Obama Administration. One of Obama's Cabinet members is responsible for the actions of the Secret Service (I believe they are a part of the Treasury Department, right? Or maybe Homeland Security now...).

Believe it or not, even amidst the layers of bureaucracy no matter how large it may be, the buck stops somewhere. Maybe nobody is responsible for anything in France, which may be why the Nazis took over Paris so easily (I am not a historian, so you'll have to excuse me for throwing out a harmless hypothesis), but things are different in America.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2012, 06:02:59 PM »

That troll still having Secret Service protection is a great example of the Obama Administration's wasteful ways.

Obama is not determining Secret Service procedures for presidential candidates protection.

What next? Are you going to blame your phimosis on Obama administration as well?

The Secret Service is a part of the executive branch of the federal government, and therefore is under the leadership of the Obama Administration. One of Obama's Cabinet members is responsible for the actions of the Secret Service (I believe they are a part of the Treasury Department, right? Or maybe Homeland Security now...).

Believe it or not, even amidst the layers of bureaucracy no matter how large it may be, the buck stops somewhere. Maybe nobody is responsible for anything in France, which may be why the Nazis took over Paris so easily (I am not a historian, so you'll have to excuse me for throwing out a harmless hypothesis), but things are different in America.

Sure... all Obama need to do is to pick up his phone, call the Secret Service's director and tell him: "hey, dude, call off Gingrich's detail".

And then Politico would bitch how bad and imperial Barack Obama is, for he dared to interfere with the Secret Service's work. Surely, Mitt Romney would never do such an evil thing.

Also, since history doesn't seem to be your strong suit, I advise to read some sources (preferably Mémoires de Guerre), before making more idiotic comparisions.

The Cabinet member that oversees the department that the SS reports to, whether it's Homeland Security or the Treasury, should have delegates who realize that it is a waste of resources to continue giving Gingrich SS protection.

Obama is not responsible for everything, but he is responsible for delegating responsibilities to people who clearly know how to subsequently delegate properly themselves. Otherwise, you get waste and poor results. It's simple management, not rocket science.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.