I understand that you never read Hegel or Gadamer if you think that "these are words".
Nice.
Are you really so intellectually insecure that whatever you don't understand right away, or presented to you like a product you can simply choose from, must be ridiculed so you feel you gained some upper hand again?
That must be tiring being so on edge all the time.
Maybe it's me, but when I see something I don't understand I start by using google and learning instead of sh**tposting memes. I fail to see what someone who thinks the level of threads should be similar to political discourse on Reddit seeks in the religion & philosophy section.
It's common courtesy on this board to at least provide some explanation for the terms and ideas you're putting forth. I try to do this even for concepts that are pretty well-known, like the Hobbesian state of nature or Kant's categorical imperative, because my goal is to include as many people in the discussion as possible. Various thinkers and authors use different terms for the same things, so when you start a thread like this, you should probably be clear up-front about what you're referencing. Personally, when I read this thread title I was expecting some reference to Nietzschean subjectivity, which didn't materialize.
Poll
