OH-12 Special Election: Balderson vs. O’Connor on August 7 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 10:48:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  OH-12 Special Election: Balderson vs. O’Connor on August 7 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH-12 Special Election: Balderson vs. O’Connor on August 7  (Read 112026 times)
InheritTheWind
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 298


« on: August 07, 2018, 08:43:23 AM »

My brain says Balderson, my gut says O'Connor.

Then again my gut was right over my brain with AL-SEN and PA-18 so who knows
Logged
InheritTheWind
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 298


« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2018, 10:20:11 PM »

A couple more nail biting wins like that in significant right leaning districts and Republicans will win themselves into a minority position of the House.

While it would have been nice to flip it, this is another massive over performance by Democrats.

Maybe - maybe not.

If this election had been held in the spring, O’Conner would have won.

If PA 18 had been held today I believe Saccone would have won.

Estes will win by a good margin in Kansas in November.  

This socialist tilt by a wing of your party is not going to be helpful to you in attracting up scale suburban Republicans.  You really need to ditch the socialists.

There maybe a Democrat Atlas red wave, but I do not fear it as much as I did yesterday.

Balderson did 9 points worse than Trump and 36 points worse than Tiberi. How is that reassuring to Republicans again?

Because they’re grasping at any straw they can at this point.
Logged
InheritTheWind
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 298


« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2018, 10:51:43 PM »

Guys, this is definitely a loss. No doubt about it. The average voter doesn't keep track of partisan lean, historical elections in the district, or any of that stuff. They sit down to watch Fox and see ' (R) beats (D)'. That's pretty much it. : /

So if I'm a swing voter in and I see "R beats D in congressional election" on the news, am I supposed to immediately think "well I guess this means I'm voting GOP in November"
Logged
InheritTheWind
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 298


« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2018, 10:58:04 PM »

Guys, this is definitely a loss. No doubt about it. The average voter doesn't keep track of partisan lean, historical elections in the district, or any of that stuff. They sit down to watch Fox and see ' (R) beats (D)'. That's pretty much it. : /

So if I'm a swing voter in and I see "R beats D in congressional election" on the news, am I supposed to immediately think "well I guess this means I'm voting GOP in November"

No that's what all the political signs of candidates on roadways are supposed to do lol

Exactly. Which is why I think "The average voter will think Balderson won so that's bad news for the Dems" is a terrible take — there's no way in hell the results of some random special election is gonna influence the vote of anyone outside of it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.