Census Estimates for 2006 -> 2010 Apportionment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 04:30:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Census Estimates for 2006 -> 2010 Apportionment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Census Estimates for 2006 -> 2010 Apportionment  (Read 7635 times)
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00
« on: December 22, 2006, 04:46:13 PM »
In a few decades with global warming living in the south won't be so viable because it will be full lbown tropical there. That and the warmth will improve the weather up north. So after 2050 or so I'd expect dixie to start losing bigtime.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2006, 06:53:07 PM »
Quote from: James S on December 22, 2006, 04:48:01 PM
Quote from: Space Moose on December 22, 2006, 04:46:13 PM
In a few decades with global warming living in the south won't be so viable because it will be full lbown tropical there. That and the warmth will improve the weather up north. So after 2050 or so I'd expect dixie to start losing bigtime.

Now that I agree with you fully about.

BTW, I will discuss this issue later, but I believe some good things can come from Global Warming.
Yup. I like the idea of the northeast having a more pleasant climate so global warming isn't that bad.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.