In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 06:19:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016?  (Read 12667 times)
Sherrod Brown Shill
NerdFighter40351
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 716
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -6.43

« on: December 25, 2017, 06:49:50 PM »

well biden would’ve been a good choice for winning the election itself, but hillary was probably the best thing that happened to democrats in terms of their long-term prospects

I completely agree. Could you imagine the sh**tstorm for Democrats in the midterms? Manchin? Dead. Donnelly? Dead. Tester? Dead. Heitkamp? Dead. Brown? Dead. McCaskill? Dead. Nelson? Dead. If 2016 had been narrow for Hillary and Republicans had a good year in 2018 then a supermajority wouldn't have been out of question.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.