UK General Discussion:The Rt. Hon Alex Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 07:28:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Discussion:The Rt. Hon Alex Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What should the title of this thread be
#1
BomaJority
 
#2
Tsar Boris Good Enough
 
#3
This Benighted Plot
 
#4
King Boris I
 
#5
The Right Honourable Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: UK General Discussion:The Rt. Hon Alex Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero  (Read 296930 times)
Don Vito Corleone
bruhgmger2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,269
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.91

« on: August 27, 2020, 10:19:56 AM »

Yes, I agree with the last post. Blair in his heydey was bigger than Jesus. I mean, just look at this. Granted, it is an internal poll (though I must say I don't know too much about the dynamics of internal polling accuracy in Britain), but it's worth something. If that's not enough, consider that Labour consistently polled near 50% during that 97-01 Parliament.
Logged
Don Vito Corleone
bruhgmger2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,269
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.91

« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2020, 09:01:47 PM »

Yes, I agree with the last post. Blair in his heydey was bigger than Jesus. I mean, just look at this. Granted, it is an internal poll (though I must say I don't know too much about the dynamics of internal polling accuracy in Britain), but it's worth something. If that's not enough, consider that Labour consistently polled near 50% during that 97-01 Parliament.

That was in the wake of his Diana response which was as close to an American style 'rally-around-the-flag' moment as we've ever come. He was freakishly popular in his early years but that was definitely an outlier.
For sure, but my point was more that Blair was very very popular in his early years before Iraq and I cannot see Howard having done much better in 2001 than the Tories ended up doing under Hague (not that it really matters but that's my thoughts on it).
Logged
Don Vito Corleone
bruhgmger2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,269
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.91

« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2021, 04:42:22 PM »

This also got me thinking again about Gordon Brown’s encounter with the “bigoted woman”. I view it as a truly tragic moment in British politics, not because of how it may or may not have affected that general election, but because cemented it being taboo to dismiss concerns about “mass immigration” as being scapegoating not grounded in economic reality.

Honestly my perception is that this moment has become much more important in hindsight (past few years) than it was considered at the time.

It's often forgotten that Rochdale was a Labour gain in 2010, so it didn't even have an impact locally. The mythologising of the incident really got going as part of the 2010 Labour leadership election, for reasons that in retrospect had little to do with national electoral politics.
Was this due to changing boundaries? Otherwise I'd be really curious as to how they picked up that seat in a year they were losing nearly 100 seats.
Logged
Don Vito Corleone
bruhgmger2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,269
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.91

« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2021, 05:10:30 PM »

This also got me thinking again about Gordon Brown’s encounter with the “bigoted woman”. I view it as a truly tragic moment in British politics, not because of how it may or may not have affected that general election, but because cemented it being taboo to dismiss concerns about “mass immigration” as being scapegoating not grounded in economic reality.

Honestly my perception is that this moment has become much more important in hindsight (past few years) than it was considered at the time.

It's often forgotten that Rochdale was a Labour gain in 2010, so it didn't even have an impact locally. The mythologising of the incident really got going as part of the 2010 Labour leadership election, for reasons that in retrospect had little to do with national electoral politics.
Was this due to changing boundaries? Otherwise I'd be really curious as to how they picked up that seat in a year they were losing nearly 100 seats.

Well they gained it from a Lib Dem who had only won by 400 votes in 2005, so it’s not hard to see why they might have won it, especially as the Lib Dems also lost seats in 2010 and their performances are often based on highly localised factors. The boundary changes did result in a notional Labour seat under 2005 numbers, but this wasn’t necessarily the be-all and end-all of it.
Ah, makes sense.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.