San Francisco went for Smith, Wilson, and Cleveland (in the case of 1892, that was the flipping point)
That’s true, of course, but San Francisco was much more cosmopolitan than coastal counties to its north and south, and had been more Democratic ever since the Civil War.
Counties north from Mendocino were as firmly anti-Catholic as Western Oregon and Western Washington – Humboldt County voted Republican in every election from 1864 to 1928 and Smith received only 28 percent there.
Wow: FDR won Grant County, WA by 22 points in 1932. He won it by 73 points in 1936.
Grant County is where Grand Coulee Dam is located – no wonder those without jobs or merely fearing their security flocked to Roosevelt with such opportunities in hydropower and irrigation!
Even more amazing is that in 1936 FDR got 73.06 percent in Adams County, Washington – yet
no Democrat, not even Johnson in 1964, has ever won there since Willkie carried Adams in 1940! In constrast, in island San Juan County where there were no massive public works projects, Roosevelt received just 48.59 percent of the vote (to Landon’s 43.26 percent or 5 percent above his nationwide vote share).
The following three articles:
- ‘The Political Economy of New Deal Spending: An Econometric Analysis’ by Gavin Wright from The Review of Economics and Statistics, v1olume 56, issue 1 (February 1974) and
- ‘A Statistical Analysis of New Deal Economic Programs in the Forty-Eight States, 1933-39’ (1972 thesis) by Donald Reading
- ‘Electoral Incentives, Public Policy, and the New Deal Realignment’ by Robert K. Fleck, from Southern Economic Journal, volume 65, issue 3 (1999)
demonstrate clearly how the New Deal targeted the West because of the higher standard deviation of its Democratic vote preference, enabling Roosevelt to maintain power. Once the Democratic Party’s congressional fortunes declined with the 1938 midterm elections, Roosevelt could not keep up this policy.