SENATE BILL: The Protection of Personal Choice Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 27, 2024, 06:23:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The Protection of Personal Choice Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The Protection of Personal Choice Act (Law'd)  (Read 9056 times)
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« on: July 21, 2011, 09:07:55 PM »
« edited: July 21, 2011, 09:11:26 PM by bgwah »

I'd be open to loosening restrictions on privately owned properties that are also public spaces. I don't care for the original bill or the amendment, though. Hmm. Nay on the amendment.

I basically agree with BK. What if we let restaurants and bars (and smoke shops, or other businesses we can think of like casinos) make their own decision if it's an 18+ establishment? I think that would be a good compromise. Here's what I'm thinking:

Amendment to the Protection of Public Health Act
1. Clause 4 of the Protection of Public Health Act is amended to read as follows: Restaurants, bars, casinos, establishments that derive at least 40% of their revenue from selling tobacco or tobacco paraphernalia, and are not open to minors, may apply to the federal government for an exemption from Clause 1. Any other business located on a privately-owned property may also apply for the exemption as long as minors are prohibited from entering. Should their exemption be approved, a "Smoking Establishment" sign shall be in plain view near any entrance into the establishment, and a valid identification shall be required to enter to ensure minors are not allowed in.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2011, 09:11:48 PM »

Uh, okay, I added "Any other business located on a privately-owned property may also apply for the exemption as long as minors are prohibited from entering" to it. Is that sufficient?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2011, 10:02:16 PM »

The only way I will support this Bill is if the exclusions extend ONLY to over 18 venues and that smoking is permitted only in clearly identified areas where ventilation has been assured etc etc.

So in other words, smoking is not to take place in general areas - but in areas that have been specifically assigned for that purpose.

Could the entire establishment be assigned that purpose? Tongue
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2011, 04:37:16 PM »

Can. Someone PLEASE describe how a business must apply for exemption? It seems unfair fro have laws so vague that even our legislators don't understand what it means.

Does it really matter? It's a fantasy world---it's not like we'll actually have to deal with bars applying for exemptions. Just pretend some part of the federal government is dealing with it, etc. Tongue
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2011, 08:10:23 PM »

abstain
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2011, 10:19:45 PM »

I'll change my vote to nay to be helpful. Tongue
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2011, 04:08:17 PM »

aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.