The Constitutional Convention (Completed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 01:04:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Constitutional Convention (Completed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Constitutional Convention (Completed)  (Read 20283 times)
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« on: August 09, 2010, 12:28:04 AM »

Looks fine to me.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2010, 03:43:02 AM »

aye
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2010, 05:49:38 PM »

"#The Senate shall be divided into two classes: Class A, which shall comprise the Senators elected from the Regions, and Class B, which shall comprise Senators elected by a form of proportional representation."

Would it be wise to throw in "as determined by the Senate" for the proportional representation part, since it doesn't specify what kind of proportional representation?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2010, 03:52:23 AM »

aye
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2010, 07:05:05 PM »

Ayayaya to all
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2010, 01:26:51 AM »

aye
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2010, 08:22:55 PM »

The first amendment sounds fine, but as for the second... Why a fourth justice? I think an odd number is preferable to avoid ties, no?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2010, 01:01:43 PM »

Even ignoring the tie issue, three seems like the right number of justices to me.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2010, 02:37:43 PM »

Aye
Nay
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2010, 02:27:56 AM »

aye
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2010, 05:32:28 PM »

aye
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2010, 03:00:29 PM »

I personally support keeping the eight month number. Undecided
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2010, 02:10:20 PM »

aye on the amendment
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2010, 02:45:22 PM »

If I may make a suggestion, would it be possible to address the issue where ILV needed 75% to vote against him for him to lose? Not that we don't all love our dearest Verin, but it seems kind of anti-democratic and harmful to the game... I think we should add something that would prohibit such practices. What do you guys think? I admittedly may have waited to long to suggest it, if so, not a big deal. Tongue
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2010, 04:21:00 PM »

Aye.

If I may make a suggestion, would it be possible to address the issue where ILV needed 75% to vote against him for him to lose? Not that we don't all love our dearest Verin, but it seems kind of anti-democratic and harmful to the game... I think we should add something that would prohibit such practices. What do you guys think? I admittedly may have waited to long to suggest it, if so, not a big deal. Tongue

The condorcet voting system?

No, they had a system for a while where 75% had to vote against the incumbent for there to be a run-off or something.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2010, 12:15:20 AM »

If you say so, Mr. President.

AYE!
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #16 on: October 08, 2010, 01:44:40 PM »

Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2010, 11:21:22 PM »

aye to both.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2010, 11:53:09 PM »

No dual office-holding, period.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2010, 07:20:03 PM »


1. AYE
2. NAY (Remain as currently worded)
3. AYE
4. AYE
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #20 on: October 15, 2010, 05:24:04 PM »

aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.