CNN Poll concerning midterms (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:10:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CNN Poll concerning midterms (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CNN Poll concerning midterms  (Read 2338 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« on: September 25, 2006, 07:32:07 PM »

I still think the generic ballot is overrated

ex. ME, while the state most likely would rather see a Democrat in the senate, they will send Olympia Snowe there with about 70%.

And states like NY which only elect one senator pump this total up, as a state like WY which only elects one senator has a low effect.

The generic ballot is never the greatest indicator.

The generic ballot is not good for the Senate, but historically has been a good indicator for the House. While I would love to see the Dems win back the Senate, I just don't think it's too probable.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2006, 06:20:13 PM »


The generic ballot is not good for the Senate, but historically has been a good indicator for the House.


Flat out just plain wrong.


The Dems led in the "generic" ballot in 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002 prior to the actual elections.  It was basically even in 2004.

The GOP had House majorities in each of these election cycles.

Granted, the gap by which the Dems lead the GOP on the "generic" ballot is larger than before (I do expect the Dems will barely retake the House BTW) but to suggest the Generic ballot is historically predictive and meaningful is simply inconsistent with reality.

Generic ballot is good indicator if polling likely voters. Not so much for registered voters. Need to check polls to see who is being polled.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2006, 07:21:01 PM »


The generic ballot is not good for the Senate, but historically has been a good indicator for the House.


Flat out just plain wrong.


The Dems led in the "generic" ballot in 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002 prior to the actual elections.  It was basically even in 2004.

The GOP had House majorities in each of these election cycles.

Granted, the gap by which the Dems lead the GOP on the "generic" ballot is larger than before (I do expect the Dems will barely retake the House BTW) but to suggest the Generic ballot is historically predictive and meaningful is simply inconsistent with reality.

Generic ballot is good indicator if polling likely voters. Not so much for registered voters. Need to check polls to see who is being polled.

Still wrong. 

The problem is people live in different districts.  The dems can easily win the nationwide vote in congress while still failing to regain control of the House.



Mathematically, your scenario is quite possible, but considering how most districts are gerrymandered, the generic ballot gives you some insight into how the few dozen competitive districts are likely to vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.